Some Known Factual Statements About Dianetics

Some Known Factual Statements About Dianetics

Blog Article

Dianetics - Truths

I couldn't ever before not wish to receive anything that comes to mind for you- if it was otherwise, I would not be sitting below with you, doing this. I not only can never have a trouble, or otherwise intend to hear something that comes to mind for you, yet I'm totally anxious to recognize every concept, every thought, every picture or feeling that emerges or manifests for you- do not ever believe otherwise, and if for some reason you do, please just let me recognize! Occasionally, you may have an idea, and image, idea or event appear that does not seem to answer the inquiry, or associate to it, however nonetheless, constantly do tell me concerning it, and as we continue, the importance will arise for you.


This is fundamental in the basis of handling, and the subject of this conversation: the fundamental roles of the counselor and the customer: The standard function of the therapist is, in contrast to "basic training", not to control, which implies to impose and/or hinder, yet to instead work from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CUSTOMER.


In subjective processing, no matter what was claimed in one's training products, the processor is not there "to control" the customer. However, the processor is there to give the client the freedom and undistracted focus to procedure and express what shows up, and what materializes is what emerges when the customer deals with the product that connects to their own goals for the processing, and for their life.

The Dianetics Diaries

John Mcmasters shared this fundamental truth incredibly well in one of his lectures on Power processing, where he clarifies exactly how he was asked what this "unique propensity" was that he had for providing such wonderful sessions; he needed to consider that for a minute, and spotted that it was what he had not been doing, in addition to what he was doing: he had not been examining, evaluating, computing, or in fact, producing any ideas, allow alone spoken expressions, after offering the command and while waiting for the PC to finish their solution to their complete satisfaction; he was, just and only, being present with the PC, and entirely interested.




The role of the therapist, demonstrated; that was his "special flair". I have had my very own experience which showed me this well, very early on in the game. In 1982, having lately finished my training and internship on New Period Dianetics, I was running this on a PC, and there was a factor in the session where (being a little bit damp behind the ears not yet having many hours under my belt as a professional auditor) the PC seemed to be "taking as well lengthy" to share anything verbally after I offered him a command.


This key transformed out to be one of the most important contribution that John ever made to the topic of therapy or auditing (Dianetics). In my humble point of view, it is the greatest contribution that anyone has ever made to these subjectsthe application is entirely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and without any type of idea, advice or opinion.no preconceived schedule for individuals, or 'levels' that they Continue must do


In Idenics, the only source of details about a customer is the specific client. In Scientology we prided ourselves on not assessing for individuals. All that really meant was that the auditor did not Vocally assess for the Computer in session. The registrars and values police officers assessed for the computer.

7 Simple Techniques For Dianetics

The Scientology Bridge is extremely evaluative and judgmentalAt initially, we liquid chalked up the distinction in results to John's improvisational abilities and experience. Upon further investigation, specific factors came to lightIt was not a matter of what he WAS doing that the other experts weren't, however instead what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Anyone that had actually ever before seen John audit might not assist however notice an one-of-a-kind high quality in his bookkeeping."The customer's standard role is to be there with the objective of moving in the direction of their spiritual objectives, and to freely and completely reveal and experience whatever shows up for them in responding to the questions and implementing the instructions in the handling.


This is something to procedure as needed. Likewise, individuals regularly have prior experience and/or brainwashing in auditing/processing which, in some ways, and to some degrees, really deceives them right into attitudes, concepts and actions patterns that avoid the full awareness of these roles, and so they will certainly have a tendency to inhibit the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the examples provided above - Dianetics. * The very first, and perhaps leading instances of mis-indoctrination causing less than entirely smooth and efficient sessions, can be found in particular elements of the training regimens, or "TR's":"TR's" are often a person's first, or a minimum of early, experience in Scientology, and while I will certainly go on to describe what I view as the defects in concept look at this site and method, nevertheless, often tend to be greatly therapeutic, done as they are given (Hubbard firmly insists that "TR's are view it not processing, they are training", however factually, they are both handling AND training)


There is no "failing", and no denial of the truth of this being processing. The focus, as it must be, is on experiencing the various other person's presence.

Dianetics Can Be Fun For Everyone

I wait up until the client checks out me as if to state "I'm done answering, over to you, what's following?" As long as the customer is looking somewhere else than back at the therapist, they are still refining the question or command. Bear in mind "a silent auditor welcomes itsa"; the client is still processing, up until their attention clearly returns to the counselor.

Report this page